WHITEHALL, Ohio (WCMH) — Whitehall voters will now have the chance to vote on a controversial tax abatement to allow for the construction of Fairway Cliffs.

Opponents of the upscale townhome development protested outside Whitehall City Hall before the meeting Tuesday night, where there was a lot of back-and-forth discussion between the city council and city attorney.

One resident said she was excited over the decision, but feels the work isn’t over just yet.

“So if there is doubt, we have three readings to rectify whatever issues there are and I’m saying what is the point of pushing something through when we aren’t even sure or some of us don’t have the understanding, it’s not clear,” said one council member. 

In April, Whitehall City Council approved three tax breaks for the nearly 50-unit Fairway Cliffs proposal. Opponents then started referendum petitions, which, with enough valid signatures, puts issues on the ballot. After about 20 minutes of discussion, council members voted 6-1 to send the tax abatement question to the November ballot.

“We’re happy with the city council and their vote and we’re excited about Nov. 4 and really want the public to come out and have their voice heard,” Whitehall resident Holly Stein said.

Council has supported the Fairway Cliffs plan and previously approved a 100-percent tax abatement for the development’s first 15 years.

“That’s where we feel this is not worth it,” Stein said. “We have many other projects in the City of Whitehall. We have Rockwell District. We have Norton Crossing. Where is the development going forward on those? We want to spend our energy and our time and our resources, our valuable tax dollars on those properties.”

Residents learned on May 7 that the petitions filed were valid. That same day, city council allowed developers from Fairway Cliffs to submit tweaks to the plan, but residents said that that move violated citizens’ rights.

“Once you have a referendum, petitions found to be sufficient, you can take no action against those, so we are satisfied on one side, but we still have some more work to do on the other side in trying to get the motion to reconsider dropped,” Stein said.

Developers have until June 17 to submit a new proposal to council. If it passes with a large majority, council can use an emergency clause to override the referendums. 

A statement from the Whitehall mayor’s office reads, in part, “The mayor’s office and the City of Whitehall welcome all public engagement in all forms and celebrate citizens exercising their civic rights.”